'Literary Genres" by Tzvetan Todorov - Chapter Summary
Todorov, Tzvetan. "Chapter 1: Literary Genres." The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a
Literary Genre. 24-57. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1975. Print.
“The Fantastic” is a name given to a kind of
literature, to a literary genre.”
Genre is about examining a text in the
context of many others belonging to the same genre, as opposed to analyzing a
text in its own right. The definition of a genre is done by examining a limited
number of texts belonging to this genre, formulating a theory of the genre, and
modifying or rejecting it, as necessary, upon examination of new texts that
belong to the same genre {biology analogy: the discovery of a mutant tiger
doesn’t make us change the definition of the tiger as a species, whereas the
discovery of an aberrant text may make us redefine the genre to which the text
belongs}. A text which does not modify our idea of the genre or bring anything
new to the literary table is categorized as pop literature, whereas it is a
revolutionary text which will make literary history.
Just because a work of literature can be
studied independently from a genre doesn’t mean we cannot study it within the
context of a genre.
Every text takes something from texts which
have preceded it, and at the same time adds something new. A new literary text
may be viewed as both taking and giving to the genre to which it belongs.
Poetics characterizes works according to deviations from the standard, and in
order for it to do that, a standard (genre) must be defined.
Northrop Frye, a literary theorist, stated
that the study of a work must be taken seriously, and without judging the
work’s value. The assumption must be made that the work is a complete, coherent
system and contains no “mistakes”. The work needs to be examined in the context
of the time (possibly a long period of time) in which it was written. A work
needs to be analyzed in reference to itself and the theoretical premises the
author created.
Frye proposed different ways (1-) to
categorize works of literature into genres (i,ii…):
In yellow- comments on categorization by Todorov
1. Modes of fiction
Defined by the relationship between the hero
and the reader or the hero and the laws of nature
i.
Myth: hero>nature, hero>reader. Superiority “by nature”
ii.
Fairy tale: hero>nature, hero>reader. Superiority “by degree
(slightly superior)”
iii.
High mimetic genre: hero>reader “by degree” (no reference to
nature)
iv.
Low mimetic genre: hero=reader, hero=nature
v.
Irony: hero<reader
Not comprehensive- other possible relationships. These
should be called “theoretical genres”
2. Verisimilitude (definition:
appearance of truth)
i. Plausible
ii. Characters can do anything
3.
Tendencies of literature
i. Comedy
ii.
Tragedy
4.
Archetypes
i. Romance
ii.
Irony
iii. Comedy
iv. Tragedy
5.
Literary audience (genre)
i. Drama (to be performed)
ii. Lyric poetry (to be sung)
iii. Epic poetry (to be recited)
iv.
Prose (to be read)
2-4,6: These classifications seems arbitrary. Why
these categories and not others?
Comments
Post a Comment
Hey friend! 🌈 I can't help with your assignments but maybe other readers can. Good luck! 🤞