The Modern World, Part One: Global History from 1760 to 1910 -- Week 6 class notes
Video 1: The Age of Imperialism
In the 1860s-70s, there is a movement away from global imperial expansion. But in the late 1870s into the turn of the 19th century, there is imperial growth again. History is not linear! Why this ebb and rise?
Gladstone in England thought that imperialism clashed with liberal ideals. During this period, Australian, Canada, and eventually South Africa and New Zealand are increasingly given independence. They only remain strong in India.
France had significant holdings like in Vietnam. In the beginning of the 1870s France has suffered significant defeats in Mexico, and turmoil at home.
In Germany, Bismarck tries to maintain balance at home rather than expanding outwards.
So why does a big wave of imperialism begin in the 1870s?
- More military power -- a "second" military evolution
- Better rifles
- Artillery
- Chemical explosives
- Steam-powered iron warships -- Navalism
- Machine guns
- Advances in communication: telegraphs rather than messengers
- The gap between advanced militaries and traditional militaries becomes huge
- Identity, power, "survival"
- Nations "need" to conquer domains for raw materials because they "need" to prove superiority to other nations
- Fear and markets
- Everyone's trying to survive and prove they're the fittest
- Protectionism (heavily regulating imports)
- Moral obligation
- British Christians aimed to prevent the burning alive of women together with their husbands
- The British missionary David Livingston aimed to end slavery in Zanzibar
- Mass culture, adventure, and manliness
- Conquering is sexy and manly. Peeps want to be sexy and manly
- Fiction like King Solon's Mines promoting manliness and adventure.
Video 2: Tipping Points
- Considerations against seizing control of Egypt
- Liberalism
- Considerations for seizing control of Egypt
- Suez canal
- Destroy the natives -- Nope, not humanitarian
- Protect the natives -- Yes, let's do this
- Treat the natives as subjects or slaves -- Nope, not humanitarian.
- Assimilate them as equals -- Nope, not a good fit
Video 3: Varieties of Imperialism
- It is enacted in the name of nationalism and racism
- Plunder and massacre of locals (by Germany for instance)
- Settler colonialism -- Europeans coming to the colonies to settle
- "Imperialism of free trade"
- Defined by historians Robinson and Gallagher, who focused on the British
- There is no master design for empires
- No necessity for formal control
- Governments are looking to establish free trade
- The result is haphazard control of the colonies by the West, with problems being solved as they arise
- Liberal imperialism (late 1800s -- early 1900s)
- Not a contradiction then!
- The Americans become involved. Mostly, they don't seek to control but to do good.
- CARTOON
- Rudyard Kipling, for instance, writes invocations for people to "save the natives" of various non-Western locales. It is sincerely well-meaning and racially patronizing. This is "The White Man's Burden"
- Anti-imperialists
- Some were racist because they didn't want whites to "assume this burden" and help non-whites
- Socialists: Imperialism is a mask for greedy capitalism
- Europeans lead the Second International, which is the contemporary international socialist movement
- Instilling a legal system in the colonies
- Instilling order in the colonies
- Old American movie: The Real Glory
- Imperial Partnerships
- In the traditional world there's the ruling elite, the subjects, and an intermediary group that arises like nobles, scholar-gentry, learned imams (depending on the locale).
- British example of imperial partnerships: a very small number of British officials ruling a large number of Indians. 1:50,000 Brits to Indians. Also some military people to keep the peace. Also a colonial elite made up of locals. In India these are the local feudal princes. So there's a British elite and a colonial (local) elite who are partners in running the country.
- In cases where the local partners are white the British end up giving power to them (in countries like Canada and Australia which became autonomous.
- Where the local partners are non-white like in India, the Brits never relinquish power
- India, 1877:
- Queen Victoria is queen empress and Earl Lytton is the viceroy ruler of India.
- In South India there are horrors due to:
- Bad crop yield
- Large portion of crop yield is allocated to export instead of to India, resulting in famine
- The British government is doctrianarian = dogmatic = rigid. They believe in not interfering with local rule but duh these are extenuating circumstances.
- The Brits distribute some rations but not enough and millions of Indians die.
- The Brits are at fault, as are the local Indian partners who are complicit in turning a blind eye
Video 4: China in the Balance
- Let's build our strength -- not so possible now; they're weak
- Let's pitch all the foreigners against each other
- The Manchu empire led by the Dowager Empress. Aided by her advisors. Rumors have it that he colluded with foreign enemies.
- Other nobles -- Yangtze viceroys who rules the Yangtze valley and formed partnerships with foreign powers + military chieftains
- Chinese reformers and revolutionaries like Sun Yat-sen who wanted a republic
- The Russians want careful, deliberate expansion. To this end, they's want to
- Partner with key Chinese people
- Control of infrastructure
- Control of finances via loans that are hard to pay back
- The British want the Passive Open Door policy
- Everyone should be allowed to trade
- Protect their traders
- They want to not necessarily control China but make sure they're not disadvantaged
- Lord Salisbury gave a great speech about dying nations and new nations
- The US wanted the Active Open Door Policy
- Commercial access
- Security and protection for their traders
- But as opposed to the Brits they want to actively oppose active imperial attempts
- Because they have no chance at a piece of China
- Germany and France are into active partition
- Divide China between nations
- Have people in China in order to have a claim
- Some "constructive" voices among the Chinese
- Confusion and division between foreign powers
- Rivalry among foreigners
- The Brits and Japanese help preserve the Qing Empire just so the Russians don't control it
- The Brits are embroiled in another war in South Africa so they can't give their full attention to the China situation
Video 5: The Wave Breaks
- Independent nations were beginning to acquire advanced technologies
- Ethiopians have modern weapons that they use against the Italians
- In South Africa there are Brits and Afrikaners, who are originally Dutch but consider themselves natives. The two sides fight and it's bloody; the Brits win but are like what is all this for.
- The Filipinos fight against the Americans, with the Americans committing atrocities and the American public isn't happy. Eventually in the 1930s-40s the Filipinos gradually get their freedom.
- The Americans give up the chance to grab the Dominican Republic in the Carribean.
- With literacy continuing to grow, tons of people are reading newspapers. Also Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad continues to grab attention, as well as Mark Twain's writings including King Leopold's Soliloquy which is a parody about imperialism.
- Wanting to destroy all of British India and go back to having a Hindu or Muslim state (and similar opinions for other nations)
- Create an Indian nation-state rather than a religious state, and run it themselves (an idea put forth in the Indian National Congress) like Australia and Canada do. Similar opinions are held by people in China about the Qing Empire: it should be replaced by a Chinese repulic.
- A more radical critique that views global imperialism as a systemic problem. The Filipino Jose Rizal spoke out worldwide against global imperialism, including the Spanish rule in the Philippines. He wasn't violent but executed by the Spanish. Another example is JA Hobson, who argues that imperialism is a product of the capitalist world system. Capitalism is pushing governments to acquire the things they need via imperialism. Socialists find this argument compelling, and Lenin, a Russian revolutionary, will build the Communist movement on top of this argument.
- Pan-responses: A countermovement against Imperialism. For instance in Asia, Japanese are divided regarding attitudes to the goings-on in China. Some are very sympathetic and want to create a Pan-Asian alliance to stand strong against European powers. (Similar sentiments are felt around the world regarding Pan-Islam and Pan-Slavic empires). This is essentially responding to imperialism with imperialism. The Japanese want to lead such an alliance (an ambition that was perceived by some as self-aggrandizing). The Japanese slowly expand their empire. They annex Taiwan in 1895 and Korea in 1910. Meantime, China weakens, with its resources increasingly exploited by foreign forces.
Comments
Post a Comment
Hey friend! 🌈 I can't help with your assignments but maybe other readers can. Good luck! 🤞