Research Question: Chance, Predestination, and Free Will in the Merchant of Venice

Chance, predestination, and free will are themes that crop up frequently in the Merchant of Venice. Different characters regard these topics differently. Portia and Nerissa disagree about Portia's father's benevolence as pertains to his devising of the casket lottery for Nerissa. Portia complains that her father has left her future to chance, whereas Nerissa believes (or claims to believe) that the lottery is engineered so that she will marry the best man. Bassanio is chosen – but is this fate or fortune? Also, Gratiano and Antonio disagree about the roles they have to play in life. Antonio feels he has been assigned the role of "the melancholy" whereas Gratiano feels he can choose his own fate. Other features of the play have to do with fate as well, such as Antonio's ships at sea and Shylock's taking charge of his future via the relatively safe undertaking of usury with the security of guarantors and contracts. Does Shakespeare favor one paradigm over another (free will/predestination), as discerned by the fate of his characters? Is one outlook portrayed as wiser than the other? Or are the two juxtaposed but with no resolution regarding their relative values?

William Shakespeare. Illustration source

Comments

Popular posts

"Professions for Women" by Virginia Woolf - Summary

In Search of Our Mothers' Gardens by Alice Walker - Summary

American Dreamer by Bharati Mukherjee - Summary

"The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Approach" by Wolfgang Iser - Article Summary

The Ethics of Living Jim Crow by Richard Wright - Summary

A Wife's Story by Bharati Mukherjee - Summary

A Journey by Edith Wharton - Summary

"Realism and the Novel Form" by Ian Watt - Chapter Summary

"A Model of Christian Charity" by John Winthrop - Summary

American Horse by Louise Erdrich - Summary